RANCH DRESSING vs KEN'S STEAK HOUSE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 5
vs
KEN'S STEAK HOUSE DRESSING: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | KEN'S STEAK HOUSE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 533 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 30 g | 53.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | KEN'S STEAK HOUSE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | KEN'S STEAK HOUSE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 867 MG |