RANCH DRESSING vs PARMESAN CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PARMESAN CAESAR DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 0
vs
PARMESAN CAESAR DRESSING: 5
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | PARMESAN CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | PARMESAN CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | PARMESAN CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 127 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 40 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 867 MG | Tie |