RANCH DRESSING vs BACON RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 0
vs
BACON RANCH DRESSING: 5
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 36.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 117 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 1,000 MG |