PRICKLY DRESSING vs SANTA FE BLEND RICH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SANTA FE BLEND RICH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
PRICKLY DRESSING: 2
vs
SANTA FE BLEND RICH DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PRICKLY DRESSING | SANTA FE BLEND RICH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 54 cal | 83 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 14.3 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PRICKLY DRESSING | SANTA FE BLEND RICH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 12.9 MG | 16 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PRICKLY DRESSING | SANTA FE BLEND RICH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 1,600 MG |