PREMIUM OLD FASHIONED BUN-LENGTH BEEF FRANKS vs UNCURED CANTIMPALO BRAND CHORIZO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED CANTIMPALO BRAND CHORIZO wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
PREMIUM OLD FASHIONED BUN-LENGTH BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
UNCURED CANTIMPALO BRAND CHORIZO: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PREMIUM OLD FASHIONED BUN-LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | UNCURED CANTIMPALO BRAND CHORIZO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 311 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 4.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 27.0 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PREMIUM OLD FASHIONED BUN-LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | UNCURED CANTIMPALO BRAND CHORIZO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PREMIUM OLD FASHIONED BUN-LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | UNCURED CANTIMPALO BRAND CHORIZO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.2 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,014 MG | 1,536 MG |