PREMIUM HAND CUT SLOW COOKED TUNA STEAK vs WILD ALASKA SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PREMIUM HAND CUT SLOW COOKED TUNA STEAK wins in 12 out of 16 nutrient categories
PREMIUM HAND CUT SLOW COOKED TUNA STEAK: 12
vs
WILD ALASKA SALMON: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PREMIUM HAND CUT SLOW COOKED TUNA STEAK | WILD ALASKA SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 176 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 19.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2.1 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 9.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PREMIUM HAND CUT SLOW COOKED TUNA STEAK | WILD ALASKA SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 12.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 1.6 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 1.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PREMIUM HAND CUT SLOW COOKED TUNA STEAK | WILD ALASKA SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 571 MG | 0 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 50 UG | 0 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 357 MG | 204 MG |