POWERCOCO vs MANGO FLAVORED THIRST QUENCHER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
POWERCOCO wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
POWERCOCO: 4
vs
MANGO FLAVORED THIRST QUENCHER: 0
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | POWERCOCO | MANGO FLAVORED THIRST QUENCHER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 11 cal | 22 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 2.5 g | 6.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | POWERCOCO | MANGO FLAVORED THIRST QUENCHER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | POWERCOCO | MANGO FLAVORED THIRST QUENCHER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 76 MG | 14 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 38 MG | 0 MG |