POTATO RING SAUSAGE vs UNCURED BEEF COCKTAIL FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED BEEF COCKTAIL FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
POTATO RING SAUSAGE: 3
vs
UNCURED BEEF COCKTAIL FRANKS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | POTATO RING SAUSAGE | UNCURED BEEF COCKTAIL FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 14.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 23.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | POTATO RING SAUSAGE | UNCURED BEEF COCKTAIL FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 37.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | POTATO RING SAUSAGE | UNCURED BEEF COCKTAIL FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 536 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 9.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 893 MG | 804 MG |