POTATO CHIPS vs LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS wins in 8 out of 14 nutrient categories
POTATO CHIPS: 2
vs
LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS: 8
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | POTATO CHIPS | LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 50 g | 82.1 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | POTATO CHIPS | LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 0 UG | 214 UG | |
| Niacin | 0 MG | 7.1 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 17.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | POTATO CHIPS | LOW FAT TUG OF WHEAT PRETZELS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 6.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 357 MG | 607 MG |