PORTMANN'S vs LITE RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
PORTMANN'S: 1
vs
LITE RANCH DRESSING: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORTMANN'S | LITE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PORTMANN'S | LITE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORTMANN'S | LITE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 967 MG | 0 MG |