PORK TENDERLOIN vs 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORK TENDERLOIN wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
PORK TENDERLOIN: 4
vs
100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORK TENDERLOIN | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 cal | 295 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 25.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PORK TENDERLOIN | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORK TENDERLOIN | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 214 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 616 MG | 58 MG |