Pork Loin Tenderloin vs FRANK ALL BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
Pork Loin Tenderloin wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
Pork Loin Tenderloin: 4
vs
FRANK ALL BEEF: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pork Loin Tenderloin | FRANK ALL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 319 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 5.6 g | |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 29.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pork Loin Tenderloin | FRANK ALL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pork Loin Tenderloin | FRANK ALL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 514 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 121 MG | 917 MG |