Pork Ham Boneless vs PORTERHSE STK CHOICE 16OZ
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORTERHSE STK CHOICE 16OZ wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
Pork Ham Boneless: 2
vs
PORTERHSE STK CHOICE 16OZ: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pork Ham Boneless | PORTERHSE STK CHOICE 16OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 134 cal | 161 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 22.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 8.0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pork Ham Boneless | PORTERHSE STK CHOICE 16OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pork Ham Boneless | PORTERHSE STK CHOICE 16OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 279 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 482 MG | 54 MG |