PORK CRACKLINS vs ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK RINDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK RINDS wins in 8 out of 14 nutrient categories
PORK CRACKLINS: 0
vs
ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK RINDS: 8
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORK CRACKLINS | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 600 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 46.7 g | 64.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PORK CRACKLINS | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 0.9 UG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORK CRACKLINS | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 30 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,867 MG | 1,929 MG |