PORK & BEEF NATURAL CASING FRANKS vs MAPLE FLAVORED PORK LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORK & BEEF NATURAL CASING FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
PORK & BEEF NATURAL CASING FRANKS: 5
vs
MAPLE FLAVORED PORK LINKS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORK & BEEF NATURAL CASING FRANKS | MAPLE FLAVORED PORK LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 cal | 345 cal | |
| Protein | 13.0 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 4.4 g | 7.3 g | |
| Fat | 28.3 g | 25.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORK & BEEF NATURAL CASING FRANKS | MAPLE FLAVORED PORK LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 15 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 193 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 818 MG |