PLANT-BASED BE'F BURGER vs ANGUS BEEF CHUCK PATTIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PLANT-BASED BE'F BURGER wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
PLANT-BASED BE'F BURGER: 7
vs
ANGUS BEEF CHUCK PATTIES: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PLANT-BASED BE'F BURGER | ANGUS BEEF CHUCK PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 153 cal | 272 cal | |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 9.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 21.9 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PLANT-BASED BE'F BURGER | ANGUS BEEF CHUCK PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PLANT-BASED BE'F BURGER | ANGUS BEEF CHUCK PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 376 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 400 MG | 56 MG |