PINTO BEANS vs RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PINTO BEANS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
PINTO BEANS: 5
vs
RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PINTO BEANS | RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 230 cal | 99 cal | |
| Protein | 8.0 g | 7.0 g | |
| Carbs | 35.4 g | 6.6 g | |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 4.2 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PINTO BEANS | RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 28.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PINTO BEANS | RICED CAULIFLOWER WHITE MEAT CHICKEN TERIYAKI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 19 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 292 MG | 291 MG |