PINELAND FARMS vs NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF AND PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PINELAND FARMS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
PINELAND FARMS: 6
vs
NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF AND PORK: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PINELAND FARMS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF AND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 246 cal | 304 cal | |
| Protein | 14.0 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 21.1 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PINELAND FARMS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF AND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PINELAND FARMS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF AND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 482 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 684 MG | 804 MG |