Pillsbury Soft Baked Double Chocolate Mini Cookies vs NABISCO TEDDY GRAHAMS LUNCHBOX COOKIES SNAK SAKS 1X8.000 OZ
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NABISCO TEDDY GRAHAMS LUNCHBOX COOKIES SNAK SAKS 1X8.000 OZ wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
Pillsbury Soft Baked Double Chocolate Mini Cookies: 2
vs
NABISCO TEDDY GRAHAMS LUNCHBOX COOKIES SNAK SAKS 1X8.000 OZ: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pillsbury Soft Baked Double Chocolate Mini Cookies | NABISCO TEDDY GRAHAMS LUNCHBOX COOKIES SNAK SAKS 1X8.000 OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 470 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 4 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 66 g | 76.7 g | |
| Fat | 22 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 3 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pillsbury Soft Baked Double Chocolate Mini Cookies | NABISCO TEDDY GRAHAMS LUNCHBOX COOKIES SNAK SAKS 1X8.000 OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pillsbury Soft Baked Double Chocolate Mini Cookies | NABISCO TEDDY GRAHAMS LUNCHBOX COOKIES SNAK SAKS 1X8.000 OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 408 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 230 MG | 167 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 240 MG | 317 MG |