PICAFLOR vs SHERRY VINTAGE COOKING WINE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PICAFLOR wins in 3 out of 7 nutrient categories
PICAFLOR: 3
vs
SHERRY VINTAGE COOKING WINE: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PICAFLOR | SHERRY VINTAGE COOKING WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 40 cal | 150 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PICAFLOR | SHERRY VINTAGE COOKING WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 1,100 MG | 600 MG |