PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK vs TOFURKY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TOFURKY wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK: 4
vs
TOFURKY: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | TOFURKY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 142 cal | 228 cal | |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 24.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 11.4 g | |
| Fat | 6.2 g | 10.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | TOFURKY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | TOFURKY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 25 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 481 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 319 MG | 696 MG |