Pepperidge Farm Milano London Fog Earl Grey Flavored Tea Cookies vs NABISCO NEWTONS COOKIES BANANA FUDGE 1X0.36 OZ
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NABISCO NEWTONS COOKIES BANANA FUDGE 1X0.36 OZ wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
Pepperidge Farm Milano London Fog Earl Grey Flavored Tea Cookies: 4
vs
NABISCO NEWTONS COOKIES BANANA FUDGE 1X0.36 OZ: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pepperidge Farm Milano London Fog Earl Grey Flavored Tea Cookies | NABISCO NEWTONS COOKIES BANANA FUDGE 1X0.36 OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 538 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 65.4 g | 70 g | |
| Fat | 26.9 g | 19.5 g | |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pepperidge Farm Milano London Fog Earl Grey Flavored Tea Cookies | NABISCO NEWTONS COOKIES BANANA FUDGE 1X0.36 OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pepperidge Farm Milano London Fog Earl Grey Flavored Tea Cookies | NABISCO NEWTONS COOKIES BANANA FUDGE 1X0.36 OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 38 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 115 MG | 300 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 154 MG | 250 MG |