PEACOCK BRAND vs SQUEEZE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SQUEEZE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
PEACOCK BRAND: 1
vs
SQUEEZE: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PEACOCK BRAND | SQUEEZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 40 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 20 g | 20 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PEACOCK BRAND | SQUEEZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 360 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PEACOCK BRAND | SQUEEZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 240 MG | 2,600 MG |