PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 3 out of 12 nutrient categories
PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL: 2
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 cal | 53 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 12.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 230 MG | 447 MG |