PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL vs ALASKA SKINLESS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL: 5
vs
ALASKA SKINLESS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | ALASKA SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 91 cal | |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 18.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | ALASKA SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 5 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | ALASKA SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 81 MG | 5 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 138 MG | 434 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 283 MG | 68 MG |