PANKO STYLE COATING vs PILLSBURY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PILLSBURY wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
PANKO STYLE COATING: 2
vs
PILLSBURY: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PANKO STYLE COATING | PILLSBURY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 368 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 10.5 g | |
| Carbs | 83.3 g | 71.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 4.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PANKO STYLE COATING | PILLSBURY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 6.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PANKO STYLE COATING | PILLSBURY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 3.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 684 MG |