PANAPESCA vs COOKED WHITE SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
PANAPESCA: 4
vs
COOKED WHITE SHRIMP: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PANAPESCA | COOKED WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 178 cal | 60 cal | |
| Protein | 24 g | 13 g | |
| Carbs | 6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2 g | 1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PANAPESCA | COOKED WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 18 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PANAPESCA | COOKED WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 120 MG | 60 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 13.7 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 440 MG | 450 MG |