ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE vs TOASTED WHOLE ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TOASTED WHOLE ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE: 4
vs
TOASTED WHOLE ALMONDS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE | TOASTED WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 378 cal | 475 cal | |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 67.6 g | 45 g | |
| Fat | 12.2 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 17.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE | TOASTED WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 3 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE | TOASTED WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 68 MG | 200 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 2.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 135 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 108 MG | 75 MG |