ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE vs FRANKFORD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE: 6
vs
FRANKFORD: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE | FRANKFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 378 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 4.2 g | |
| Carbs | 67.6 g | 68.8 g | |
| Fat | 12.2 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 2.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE | FRANKFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORNAMENT MARSHMALLOW COVERED MILK CHOCOLATE | FRANKFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 68 MG | 125 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 135 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 108 MG | 62 MG |