ORIGINALS BATTER DIPPED THIN CUT ONION RINGS vs HUNTERS STICKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HUNTERS STICKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ORIGINALS BATTER DIPPED THIN CUT ONION RINGS: 4
vs
HUNTERS STICKS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINALS BATTER DIPPED THIN CUT ONION RINGS | HUNTERS STICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 238 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 35.7 g | |
| Carbs | 30 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fat | 11.3 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINALS BATTER DIPPED THIN CUT ONION RINGS | HUNTERS STICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINALS BATTER DIPPED THIN CUT ONION RINGS | HUNTERS STICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 214 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 125 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 625 MG | 2,536 MG |