ORIGINAL ULTRA-THIN WITH QUINOA RICE SQUARES vs TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL ULTRA-THIN WITH QUINOA RICE SQUARES wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL ULTRA-THIN WITH QUINOA RICE SQUARES: 5
vs
TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL ULTRA-THIN WITH QUINOA RICE SQUARES | TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 533 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 60 g | |
| Carbs | 81.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 6.2 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL ULTRA-THIN WITH QUINOA RICE SQUARES | TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL ULTRA-THIN WITH QUINOA RICE SQUARES | TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 31 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 281 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 312 MG | 2,533 MG |