ORIGINAL SAUSAGE LINKS vs HATFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL SAUSAGE LINKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL SAUSAGE LINKS: 5
vs
HATFIELD: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL SAUSAGE LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 16.4 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 2.7 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 17.8 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL SAUSAGE LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL SAUSAGE LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 507 MG | 750 MG |