ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN vs 80% LEAN/20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK PATTIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN: 4
vs
80% LEAN/20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK PATTIES: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN | 80% LEAN/20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 253 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 17.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN | 80% LEAN/20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN | 80% LEAN/20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 241 MG | 67 MG |