ORIGINAL PORK RINDS vs OLD WISCONSIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL PORK RINDS wins in 8 out of 14 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL PORK RINDS: 8
vs
OLD WISCONSIN: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL PORK RINDS | OLD WISCONSIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 440 cal | |
| Protein | 64.3 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 36 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL PORK RINDS | OLD WISCONSIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 2.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0.9 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL PORK RINDS | OLD WISCONSIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 30 UG | 0 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,929 MG | 1,520 MG |