ORIGINAL PORK LINKS vs SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL PORK LINKS: 3
vs
SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL PORK LINKS | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 327 cal | 316 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 8.8 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 8.8 g | |
| Fat | 25.5 g | 28.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL PORK LINKS | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL PORK LINKS | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 70 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 745 MG | 1,193 MG |