ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS vs CHICKEN CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS: 5
vs
CHICKEN CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS | CHICKEN CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 263 cal | |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 9.2 g | |
| Carbs | 12.9 g | 34.2 g | |
| Fat | 12.1 g | 10.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS | CHICKEN CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS | CHICKEN CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 57 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 211 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 521 MG | 776 MG |