ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON vs CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON: 5
vs
CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON | CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 171 cal | |
| Protein | 42.9 g | 17.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4.3 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 9.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON | CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 42.9 MG | 1.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON | CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,000 MG | 521 MG |