ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES vs COOKIE THINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKIE THINS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES: 1
vs
COOKIE THINS: 5
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | COOKIE THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 82.1 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | COOKIE THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | COOKIE THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 286 MG | 375 MG |