ORIGINAL CRISPY RICE TREATS vs TAMARIND BALLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAMARIND BALLS wins in 6 out of 16 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL CRISPY RICE TREATS: 4
vs
TAMARIND BALLS: 6
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL CRISPY RICE TREATS | TAMARIND BALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 412 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 73.5 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 10.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL CRISPY RICE TREATS | TAMARIND BALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
| Niacin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Pantothenic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL CRISPY RICE TREATS | TAMARIND BALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 32 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 29 MG | 335,714 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 382 MG | 18 MG |