ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS vs BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS: 3
vs
BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 600 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 53.3 g | 35.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 40 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | BEEF SWEET & SNAPPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,533 MG | 1,286 MG |