ORIGINAL BEEF CHUCK BURGER vs FULLY COOKED TURKEY MAPLE SAUSAGE PATTIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FULLY COOKED TURKEY MAPLE SAUSAGE PATTIES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL BEEF CHUCK BURGER: 2
vs
FULLY COOKED TURKEY MAPLE SAUSAGE PATTIES: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL BEEF CHUCK BURGER | FULLY COOKED TURKEY MAPLE SAUSAGE PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 278 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 16.6 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 23.2 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL BEEF CHUCK BURGER | FULLY COOKED TURKEY MAPLE SAUSAGE PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL BEEF CHUCK BURGER | FULLY COOKED TURKEY MAPLE SAUSAGE PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 56 MG | 732 MG |