ORGANIC SUGARCOATED GUMMY FRUITS vs MIKE AND IKE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORGANIC SUGARCOATED GUMMY FRUITS wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
ORGANIC SUGARCOATED GUMMY FRUITS: 3
vs
MIKE AND IKE: 0
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORGANIC SUGARCOATED GUMMY FRUITS | MIKE AND IKE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 318 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 84.7 g | 88.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORGANIC SUGARCOATED GUMMY FRUITS | MIKE AND IKE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORGANIC SUGARCOATED GUMMY FRUITS | MIKE AND IKE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 247 MG | 60 MG |