ORGANIC FRUIT SPREAD vs RIESLING PRESERVES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RIESLING PRESERVES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ORGANIC FRUIT SPREAD: 4
vs
RIESLING PRESERVES: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORGANIC FRUIT SPREAD | RIESLING PRESERVES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 147 cal | 153 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.1 g | |
| Carbs | 35.3 g | 37.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORGANIC FRUIT SPREAD | RIESLING PRESERVES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 28.2 MG | 6.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORGANIC FRUIT SPREAD | RIESLING PRESERVES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 158 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 42 MG |