ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING: 5
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 167 cal | 517 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 55.2 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORGANIC CAESAR DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,300 MG | 690 MG |