ORANGE SWEET ROLLS WITH ICING vs REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORANGE SWEET ROLLS WITH ICING wins in 6 out of 14 nutrient categories
ORANGE SWEET ROLLS WITH ICING: 6
vs
REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORANGE SWEET ROLLS WITH ICING | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 347 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 4.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 53.1 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fat | 12.2 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORANGE SWEET ROLLS WITH ICING | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 1.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORANGE SWEET ROLLS WITH ICING | REDUCED FAT CRESCENT ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 571 MG | 821 MG |