ONION FLAVORED SNACKS RINGS vs AGED WHITE CHEDDAR BAKED PUFFS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
AGED WHITE CHEDDAR BAKED PUFFS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
ONION FLAVORED SNACKS RINGS: 3
vs
AGED WHITE CHEDDAR BAKED PUFFS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ONION FLAVORED SNACKS RINGS | AGED WHITE CHEDDAR BAKED PUFFS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ONION FLAVORED SNACKS RINGS | AGED WHITE CHEDDAR BAKED PUFFS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 393 MG | 607 MG |