OLD WISCONSIN vs NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD WISCONSIN wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
OLD WISCONSIN: 4
vs
NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OLD WISCONSIN | NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 301 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 11.5 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fat | 30.4 g | 28.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OLD WISCONSIN | NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OLD WISCONSIN | NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,268 MG | 920 MG |