OLD WISCONSIN vs TAMARIND BALLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD WISCONSIN wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
OLD WISCONSIN: 5
vs
TAMARIND BALLS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OLD WISCONSIN | TAMARIND BALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.3 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 31.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OLD WISCONSIN | TAMARIND BALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OLD WISCONSIN | TAMARIND BALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 32 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 335,714 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,250 MG | 18 MG |