OLD LONDON vs CLASSIC PORK RINDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD LONDON wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
OLD LONDON: 4
vs
CLASSIC PORK RINDS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OLD LONDON | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OLD LONDON | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OLD LONDON | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,036 MG | 1,500 MG |