OLD FASHIONED TENDER CRACKLINS CHICHARRON vs EN FUEGO CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD FASHIONED TENDER CRACKLINS CHICHARRON wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
OLD FASHIONED TENDER CRACKLINS CHICHARRON: 4
vs
EN FUEGO CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OLD FASHIONED TENDER CRACKLINS CHICHARRON | EN FUEGO CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 57.1 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 42.9 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OLD FASHIONED TENDER CRACKLINS CHICHARRON | EN FUEGO CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OLD FASHIONED TENDER CRACKLINS CHICHARRON | EN FUEGO CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 5.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,643 MG | 1,071 MG |